About Me

Name: King David Caul
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

MEN - MUST READ THIS !!! (Mid-East Conflict Resolved!)

Wow -- I figured it out! It suddenly struck me! Why hadn't we thought of this before!?!

"What" you ask? Why...THE GREAT COMPROMISE!

My fellow men, what have we been thinking!? We have a strange opportunity at hand which might just slip us out of many of the Nation's messes; check this out:

Code pink and their ilk want us out of the Mideast. Fine! Cindy Sheehan, Nancy Pelosi, Rosie O'Donnell, Janine Garofalo, Susan Sarandon, etc., you're going to get what you want (oh, careful what you wish for!). Bad America is going to get out...and give up. YEP - GIVE UP!

Here's the new plan: We propose a SUMMIT with major Islamic leaders, based on some simple give and take. We relent; We adopt their "title" -- We join the Islamic Fraternity. They relent here and there; for one, by scratching out the anti-good time clauses (beer and frat parties are still to be legal). We party together! We get them drunk. Our new pals, We meet midway!

We're...Muslem-ettes...Mus-Lite...Quoran-lite...Quoran 2.1 ?

They get to see a new Muslim faith sweeping the globe. For the Muslim world - it is a great victory! For our part, we'll get alcohol tolerant Islam, reductions in global hostility, and... multiple subservient wives!

Dudes, what we get could be awesome. Let's start with four wives! She'll have to clear out of the workplace. And kiss all that sexual harassment sludge adios.

Now it must be said, more than 1 wife is not necessarily a good thing. No man wants multiple Claire Huxtables (from the Cosby show - Just for example). Even one of these condescending, 'superior', humor-broken women would make life a drag; imagine FOUR of them! But strip her of her airs of superiority, remove her from the work pool, keep her tied to the house, and add three more with even better personalities and figures - it starts to resemble a racey men's club!

Hey, let her enjoy a good thrashing at her first infidelity (or ankle exposure). She'll settle in! She'll get with the program. Hell, seeing our pop-culture's shrill harpies muzzled by a nice ancient patriarchal culture would just about make me praise Allah at that.

Oh, I suppose I wouldn't truly believe in my heart. But that's not that much different from saying "God bless America" in the same room where you have to prepare your taxes. It can be mostly symbolic; for it's the SHOW that will matter!

It MIGHT generate a second possible course of events: our Mus-Lite movement activates and inverts the previously brain dead American apologists, and they suddenly see the Islamic writing on the wall, and FREAK OUT... cool! They can get a rifle (thanks to the late great Charleston Heston and friends) and go find the Mid-East battle frontier. We can let the noisemakers REPLACE our patriotic soldiers. Again, not a bad outcome at all!

Now I know, there are you male feminists who are reading this and thinking; "but I don't want to see women threatened, I don't want to erode any equality." I will refer you to my blog piece on equality. For you see, women have never wanted equality. No more than we males have wanted a "satisfactory" paycheck. You want a KICKASS paycheck, just like everyone else. In the same way, women want advantage and superiority, just like everyone else. Equality my butt. (Ironically, you're the same guys who behave as a gentleman, and would say "women and children first" at the lifeboats of the Titanic. This male support of feminism is just a tactic you have found generally successful for getting laid, and all we men know it.) When the new rules become "NICE children first, obnoxious & violent children next, and every man and woman for themselves", I'll begin to believe in equality.

Now, devout Christians can maintain their beliefs, only now under a dual-spiritual-citizenship program. Christ won't care what you "tell people" in public, if the result is a less war-torn world. Christ loved peace.

...And George Soros and Osama bin Laden have big fat wallets; they can throw some killer parties...

And the middle-east would no longer have the West to to demonize. Being crazed lunatics, they'll return to fierce squabbling with their neighbors and with the new nuclear arsenals on the horizon, will probably do a fairly good job of annihilating each other...

And no longer being complete infidels, they'll simply have to excuse our brand of "slacker" Islam. (it isn't a slight against the faith; it is the way we do everything!)

And we will get to see gloria steinham jump off a tall building (or ride her famous bicycle straight into the ocean).

Also, as a world movement begins to adopt the new Mus-Lite lifestyle, the Muslim hardliners will probably moderate; why wouldn't they -- they can now enjoy an ice cold Heineken, or a mojito! And having now accepted alcohol into their lifestyle, the original Islamic fascists would probably become a first-rate pain-in-the-*ss down at the local pub; but they wouldn't be so damn pissed off at the planet all the time! They'd learn to live-a-little, do karaoke, and go bowling. They'll begin to pick up on phrases like, "Life's too short", and other Miller/Budweiser type slogans.

Since there'd be no meaningful competition for the spiritual conquering of the world, they'd probably develop the next obvious complex competitive pursuit: computer games! -- Grand Theft Auto, Supreme Commander! ...AND, being fairly new to the scene, they'd LIKELY go off the deep-end and become virtual addicts, with little will to do much else aside from topping their last significant score. (The next step is a modern existentialism, identified easily by the ever recurring pronunciation of "whatever"). Totally dismissible at that point!

Now, you might say that puts the bulk of our global oil supply in a dangerous volatile predicament. Good. We just anticipate this, and we offer as part of the compromise, to turnover the ruins of our US auto industry. That is, unless Ford and GM and the rest take a nice big adult step into the future. That would be good for them, good for us, and good for the USA. (They simply don't seem to have the courage to do it on their own, now do they?) ...But we kiss oil goodbye. We let our Middle Eastern oil barons go crazy on each other, and we move on. It's been said before, but, "if we can put a man on the moon..."

It would be a lesson in losing the battle, but winning the war. On a big scale -- but that's just it, we win big in the end.
So a lot of people lose in this scenario, but NOT the U.S. male. So why should we sit around taking crap internally and externally, blamed for every domestic and international ill, while struggling to get by... even while being simultaneously accused of enjoying great advantage! AND being expected to sacrifice FIRST for our great way of life? Let's pursue our OWN best interests for a time!

It's time for Nancy Pelosi to put on a kevlar vest, and earn her keep! She needs to EARN her freedom. So Nancy, the code pink members, Rosie O'Donnell and all the rest of the American apologists can celebrate the glorious victory of their team as we lose the war like they've been wanting us to; but immediately following that, they can be provided their new tent/berka, and the rest of us can enjoy not seeing their ever-indignant mugs again!

Hell, just getting Rosie O'Donnell to cover her face alone would practically make the whole endeavor worthwhile!

 

 

©2008 king david caul

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The World Hates The U.S. Because of HOLLYWOOD!

Hollywood is the chain smoker, who has quit and now drinks too much; and preaches ad nauseam about bad oral habits, while simultaneously being a total lush.

How perverse it has become; with the regular ACTOR/GLOBAL-GEOPOLITICAL-SUPERGENIUS appearances, admonishing anyone they don't think is groovy and giving the nation and world TRUE direction of REAL expertise. And the studios and directors; cranking out hyper-moralistically poised fluff-balls, pretending to judge sternly and with great merit the behavior of the world around them. Hollywood's elite are champions and heroes at the pointing out of our bad morality, bad politics, greed, and severe prejudices.

 Now folks, this is NEW Hollywood! Do NOT BEGIN to confuse this new intellectually and spiritually superior Hollywood with the one that gave us...say, reefer madness. A piece of propaganda directly linkable to the outlawing of minor drugs and the creation of laws directed at harassment of lower class minorities. And, no, not the Hollywood that enjoyed years of applied racism in its works, permitting the occasional Negro maid -- and even demanding its own supertalent Lena Horne use the back door. This is not the same Hollywood that painted "injuns" as dogs to be picked off by heroes.

No, this is the NEW Hollywood. It has new concerns:

  • The heavy-handed advocacy of "edginess" -- risks, and abuses -- a "destructive nature" has been made cool! REALLY cool!
  • The glamorization of drugs. And CASH!! AND SEX!!!!!! AND GUNS!!!!!!!!
  • The pounding of its fists with self assured anti-US sentiment. As if anything else is completely out of the question and as such madness. "The only sane conception of politics is a reasonable and intelligent anti-US stance!"
  • The dissolution of that tired old "family". Look, Beaver Cleaver and his family were SO overrated. Family is SO overrated! Some progressive exploration of ANY alternative at all, is healthy, cool, hip, and infinitely better. We have to get OVER that dopey stuff.
  • The noble rage against business. Because, PLEASE, big businesses are entities that just want to make money and as such are bad! Bad! Bad!... (and "pay no attention to that man behind the curtain"... never mind that Hollywood studios are large business entities, that just want to make money...) (And if you suffer a viewing of the movie "Twister" - I pity you. I would rather be hit by flying debris from the twister than smashed in the face with the ridiculously heavy-handed anti-corporation morality message of the film. Wow, it's JUST AWFUL).
  • Making sure the world realizes completely that Government is BAD. Government makes the Middle East HATE us. (In fact, the sin, decadence, violence, and endless perversions propagated and represented by the Hollywood film industry frightens the s**t out of people everywhere!)

Throughout the entire world Hollywood disseminates and aggressively distributes endless streams of gratuitous sex, gratuitous violence, uber-edgy behavior, drug use, and psychopathic insanity. All in the name of entertainment... but in the PURSUIT of extreme greed for wealth. The irony, arrogance, and hypocrisy are stunning.

These negative stereotypes of our population reside in the far corners of the world from their release onward, in a way that is indelible; in a manner an adversarial newspaper headline in Jakarta could never hope to achieve.

Hollywood has endlessly painted the populace and government of the United States as selfish, overindulgent, decadent, cheating, ignorant, sexually obsessed, immoral, criminally bent, and endlessly violent. Is a surprise that somewhere out there someone believes it? But these geo-political authorities in entertainer's clothing know what they're talking about - they know greed and vanity when they see it!!

Who is Hollywood to judge anyone? Anyone at all? Make all the movies you want Hollywood, but keep your political superiority to your d**n selves.

 

 

 

 

©2008 king david caul

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

This week US death toll in City of Chicago higher then in Nation of Iraq

Over the past week (Apr 16 - 23) eleven Americans were killed in the nation of Iraq¹, While in the city of Chicago, over the weekend alone, 32 were shot and 2 Stabbed, leaving 7 Dead. 20 were shot in less than 24 hours. On April 23, 5 more were killed in a South Side shooting. That's twelve killed in this U.S. city over the same period.

Should we "pull out" of Chicago?

Is this the dreaded quagmire so often named by Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, or the Janine Garofalos of the actor/historian/political experts realm?

What about Sen. Dickie Durbin? It's his state; How does he feel about the US presence in this violent region?

 

Just some more background for better comprehension:

Chicago Crime statistics (Just the CITY, not the State!):

  • In This School Year Alone, 24 Students Were Killed (Since September)
  • Last school year 34 students were killed (24 of which were gun-related). That's 58 deaths over what amounts to a 17-month period.
  • 345 homicides this past year (since June 15, 2007)²
  • 87 homicides from January - March this year.² (30 homicides in march, 11 homicides from April 1 - 14 ²)
  • 24,652 crimes in the last 30 days.²

And these are record LOWS!

At the state level (Illinois)³ :

  • 770 homicides in Illinois in 2005
  • 780 homicides in 2006 (More recent figures were not found, but were projected to rise slightly).
  • for 2006 - aggravated assault & batterys: 40,984, sexual assaults: 5,646, robberies: 23,816

On the highways (and I believe dying on the highway means dying on the highway, whether from insurgent IEDs or drunk driving)

  • 38 killed January 1 - 21, 2008 ( Most recent statistic found, and which is actually down from 71 at this time in 2007)
  • 1,245 killed in collisions in 2007 (which is actually the lowest number of fatal accidents since 1924!).
  • U.S. Military Deaths in IRAQ for 2008 ¹

    • APRIL - 34
    • MARCH - 39
    • FEBRUARY - 29
    • JANUARY - 40

    I'm not trying to justify or apologize for any mishandling of Middle Eastern war efforts. But it sickens me that many reject perspective. Every single casualty in an armed conflict zone critical to the future of the handicapped globe is tallied and described to us repeatedly to drive home an agenda and message. Yes it's valid, but the dripping condemnation included in these tallies loses perspective against the truth behind the statistics of violence throughout the world and indeed here at home. The only meaningful debate is the nobility or legitimacy of the war. If it is important or noble, the death toll in Iraq is historically nominal by relevant measure. That's not the same as saying acceptable, but it is an argument for maintaining intelligent perspective.

    Of course, the debate on the legitimacy or nobility of this war will be profoundly divisive. But at least it is the real point.


    ¹ icasualties.org

    ² Chicago Police website

    ³ Illinois police website

    .

    ©2008 king david caul

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
    « Previous1Next »